While
training Sniffy was similar to training Snickerpuss, there were differences in
the two training methods. One of
the biggest differences was the time it took to complete training with Sniffy
compared to Snickerpuss. Magazine training for Sniffy and Nicky took only 20
minutes, but training Nicky was definitely harder because her behavior was more
erratic than Sniffy’s. While Sniffy tended to stay near the lever, Nicky
explored her cage and spent time self-grooming. The process of shaping is where
I saw the biggest difference between Sniffy and Nicky. It took me about 50
minutes to shape Sniffy due to human error with the training process – I missed
two opportunities to reward Sniffy and eventually had to start over because she
was not engaging any behavior that would lead to lever pressing. Shaping Nicky
took three 30 minute sessions. Again, some of our struggle was due to human
error in the reinforcement process, but with a live rat, we did not have the
option to restart the process when reinforcement opportunities had been missed.
Cumulative
Record for Fixed Ratio 7 (one of our most successful days)
While
the Sniffy program was frustrating because of the amount of time it took to
complete, it was definitely beneficial to do it before live rat training
because it gave me an idea of what behavior I should reinforce when live
training Nicky. Without the Sniffy program, live rat training would have been
much more difficult. However, I think I learned more from live rat training
because it was unpredictable and often times Nicky just did not do what we
wanted her to. When training with the virtual rat, I knew the behavior would
eventually start, but with live training, behavior would not develop if we did
not reinforce the proper behavior. I learned how to adapt to unpredictable
situations and plan ahead. In the future, it would be beneficial to use both
programs as we did. The virtual rat gives an idea of what to expect when live
training, but the live rat gives tangible experience for how unpredictable
training can be.
No comments:
Post a Comment